Chalcedonian Christology: Dyophysitism and Dyothelitism

(Cyril’s Line)
μία φύσις τοῦ Θεοῦ Λόγου σεσαρκωμένη
One incarnate nature of God the Word
St. Athanasius:
"It was not a man who died for us, but the Lord in His human nature." (Letter to Adelphius, 4)
"There are not two Sons, one suffering and the other impassible." (Contra Apollinarium, I.12)
- Unity of the one Person of the Logos, fully divine and fully human.
- No confusion, no change, no division, no separation.
- St. Athanasius: not “two Sons,” but one Son who truly suffered in the flesh (Ep. to Adelphius 4; Contra Apollin. I.12).
“Combined" implies a fusion
• If Christ’s divinity and humanity were combined, it could suggest that His human nature was diminished or lost within the divine nature.
• This would contradict St. Cyril of Alexandria’s teaching, which insists that Christ remains fully divine and fully human in a perfect unity.
Preferred Coptic Term: "One Incarnate Nature" (μία φύσις τοῦ θεοῦ λόγου σεσαρκωμένη)
• This affirms that Christ’s divinity and humanity are united without mixture, change, separation, or division.
• In reality, the Coptic fathers never talked about two natures before or after the incarnation, the logos took humanity and became Man
• It preserves the mystery of the Incarnation without suggesting a loss of either nature.
Important Terminology
Term | Coptic Acceptance? | Why |
---|---|---|
Composed | ❌ | Sounds like a third thing (Eutychian risk) |
Compound | ❌ | Implies alteration of natures |
Combined/Fused | ❌ | Diminishes full humanity/divinity |
One Incarnate Nature (Miaphysis) | ✅ | Affirms perfect unity of the one Person, full divinity & full humanity |